Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law
My theories, work, and life is heavily involved with a science that conservative scientists do not seem to conclude with properly in their assessment of what I expound in my writings. I do not necessarily write for them; and this might seem deplorable to them for they do understand that on many planes I exist on the same page as them with similar aspirations. No doubt, a conservative scientist is not involved with the apparent cryptic symbolism that is common with my Great Work; and they ordinarily pass up data that might be useful in their laboratories.
Nonetheless, it is part of the normal curriculum to adhere to the method of science; and although I am not creating an elixir that is genetically mutated from a Tbx20 common gene, nor using gamma radiation to mutate toads, nor engaged in anything that would seem normal to a scientist that is portrayed as a stereotype. - I am most certainly engaged in scientific work to stimulate, promote the evolution of the human species into the next step - and most certainly not using any method to achieve my goals that is considered acceptable, moral nor clear to my colleagues who call themselves scientists. Such is the raw option of the independent researcher who need not bother with particulars; and actually concentrate on the priorities of real discovery. One such scientist, Mike Majerus who became a Professor at the University of Cambridge is an excellent example of an individual who had real aspirations such as mine; yet took all those steps which I rejected. Yet Mike's upbringing, the mold that he permitted to be cast into by his colleagues simply did not exist for myself, where my real motivations was a way to find doorways to the secrets of the universe. As the years moved forth, I watched with idle curiosity his career as a scientist bloom from a naive student to a Professor that was being honored publicly for his teachings & research.
He did what I was supposed to do in the opinion of others. I flatly rejected any advice to teach school; and rudely slammed the door on the thought or advice of becoming a Professor anywhere. I wanted to do, not teach. (Remember the old saw, Those Who Can't Do, Teach?)
Nonetheless, Mike Majerus continued to comply with the standards & boundaries of a public scientist & scholar, even becoming a Professor took those steps on the Path of science & research where my independence would have been compromised by dogmatic overseers. With no little shock, I heard that Mike Majerus had died of cancer; and having followed his career I knew that he should not of died so early. So much for the complying with the standards of his peers I thought. No doubt, being a Professor & his field research with peppered moth and harlequin ladybird would have him remembered. Yet his approach was watered down whiskey in comparison to my discoveries & private research. Well, I'm still alive working daily in my laboratory while he is now but a memory. Such is the lesson of two scientists, both involved with evolution. Yet his career was not attuned to his own true will, and was simply rash compliance to the routine dogma of the hypnotized intellectual community. That Mike Majerus died under suspicious circumstances cannot be denied; and I am not at all satisfied with the lack of explanations on how he could have had Mesothelioma cancer which as everybody knows has its origin with asbestos. Now, how did a scientist, a professor, and a scholar happen to have inhaled asbestos particles??? Now, tell us what really happened!I am pleased with my choice to remain independent with my research, and to find a Path which completely satisfies my endless hunger for the infinite.
All science is connected. You cannot be a Chemist without knowing about related scientific subjects; and with myself the connection with ancient folklore, polytheistic religion, attributes of spirits from old magick books and the goal of evolution are only apparent when a study of the subject comes into full bloom.
Yet what is initiation? Could it be when you really study the word & its consequences we are describing evolution itself? Yes, well we are now in a position to create an alternate name for our peculiar science of evolution that actually promotes the reality of the evolution of our species to the pinnacles of power; and the absolute glory of pragmatic insight.
No doubt, you could state that I've compromised my reputation by taking such a Path. I must boldly state here that a scientist that does not comply with ordinary educational dogma; and has aspirations to discover what we are going to evolve into is going to take liberties, and move in directions that will not include the strict overseers that predominate the academic community.
Yet have you really studied what has been expounded along these lines of research? Yet all those who have read, studied, and carefully seen the point of ONE STAR IN SIGHT, and have actually joined forces with us with this work can be rightfully given the title scientist in spite of the misunderstanding that predominate the scientific community on our sublime work.
As free will goes, you have choices. You should consider which option will not stifle your creative genius; and move forth unafraid of the consequences of your actions.
This article therefore to the scientific community is not necessarily an appeal to join us; but to remember this grave lesson of independence with scientific research & not fall into a pit where your creative faculties are stifled by an academic system that recoils upon itself in its meager attempt for order within the system.
Love is the law, love under will
